THE JANUARY EFFECT
Financial markets are influenced by more than just company results posted in the earnings season and economic statistics. Investor behaviour, habits, and expectations all play a role, especially at certain times of year. One such moment is January. After the Christmas break, investors return with different strategies and new expectations about what the coming months could bring. That alone makes January an interesting period for market watchers. The idea that a certain month could offer clues about market direction is controversial. Some believe that January has a great say in sentiment and momentum, while others say the markets are less concerned with the calendar.
-
WHAT IS THE JANUARY EFFECT?
The January Effect refers to the idea that stock prices show a certain pattern in January compared with other months. It is usually described as a tendency rather than a rule, and it is not something that appears every year. While the term is widely used, it remains a subject of discussion, with opinions divided on how meaningful it really is. The theory, partly based on investor psychology, is that investors look at their portfolios, consider new possibilities, and might be more open to taking risks at the beginning of the year. When large numbers of people do the same thing, their actions can influence market movements. The idea is that stock prices tend to rise in January because of this (and other) factors, creating the so-called January effect. And human psychology being what it is, could even create this positive effect, if enough people believe it’s a ‘thing’. The other part of the January effect is the idea that stock prices rise after tax-loss selling in December.
-
WHAT IMPACT DOES JANUARY HAVE UPON STOCK PRICES AND WHY?
The real question is not whether January matters, but how much it matters. In some years, market performance appears to support the idea of a strong January. In others, it clearly does not. Other major factors, such as economic growth, inflation, interest rates, and political events, often have a larger influence than seasonal trends. Recent data does support the idea that January is a positive month for stock prices both over a long-term period and over the past 5 – 10 years. The data shows that January is one of the best-performing months of the year, alongside November and April. Looking at the most recent performance over the average January performance from 2020 – 2024 of top stocks like Apple (+3.28%), Tesla (+11.83%), Google (+5.04%), and Facebook / Meta (+3.21%), the results appear more conclusive. But past performance is no guarantee that the January effect will work in the future.
-
JANUARY 2026 MARKET PERFORMANCE CONNECTED TO GEO(POLITICAL) FACTORS
The month isn’t over yet, but most analysts would agree that geopolitical developments and economic turbulence are more intense than in previous years. Volatility caused by trade concerns has challenged market growth after the US threatened to hike tariffs on European countries over Greenland. The massive strides made by stocks in recent months have also worried traders that prices of AI-linked stocks may be frothy (overbought) and that there could be a pullback. The US administration appearing to challenge the independence of the Fed is not welcomed by markets, which seek stability and data-driven policy. On the other hand, there has been a strong earnings season, and most economic indicators suggest the US economy remains robust. With some days remaining this month, stocks appear set to finish in the green.
Conclusion
The January Effect remains an interesting idea of market discussion, not because it always works, but because it shows how investors think. It highlights a desire to see patterns and to find familiarity where there is uncertainty, amid a belief that timing can be of great importance when making major decisions. In some ways, it tells us more about human psychology than the behavior of the markets, but if this is true, another question can be posed: Doesn’t the entire market consist of combined human psychology anyway? In other words, even if the effect isn’t a real ‘thing’, if enough people believe it is, does it not become real?